simonsays74 wrote:it's crap suspension for crap cars..........
......now that's technically correct/accurate
I'd still have a DS or an SM, or in fact a C6!
And Bentley must be crap too, by that logic!!
Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy
Non Member
512
Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:39 pm
Shenzhen, China
by LiamMcShane » Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:28 pm
simonsays74 wrote:it's crap suspension for crap cars..........
......now that's technically correct/accurate
Non Member
1296
Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:12 pm
Belfast (££££ Zone!!)
by simonsays74 » Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:24 pm
LiamMcShane wrote:simonsays74 wrote:it's crap suspension for crap cars..........
......now that's technically correct/accurate
I'd still have a DS or an SM, or in fact a C6!
And Bentley must be crap too, by that logic!!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 248 guests
