Sins of the father ?

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Sins of the father ?

Postby clee » Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:12 pm

How many of the GTA's tuning restrictions were carried over to the 610 :?:
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:55 pm

Well ill list all the similarities and differences so you can work it out.. :)

Identical manifolds and turbo backplate
Much larger exhaust turbine housing and compressor wheel on turbo, but same restrictive 2"1/4 turbo outlet to downpipe.
Same 55mm throttle body
244 degree cams instead of 228 degree duration - same valve lift
46mm and 39mm valves verses 44mm and 37mm
Identical sized ports (but unrestricted valve guide area on A610)
Intercooler is angled towards spoiler and flows from one side to the other.
Reprogrammable ecu.
Lower compression
Weaker pistons on A610
Thinner liners on A610
Slightly larger inlet manifold design, but roughly the same
Last edited by David Gentleman on Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
User

gt5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

594

Joined

Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm

Location

york


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby gt5 » Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:26 pm

dave when does the throttle body start becoming restrictive?
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:16 pm

No problem with 55mm, the engine will never rev high enough to warrant being larger, and if it did, would require all the boost hoses and intercooler inlet and outlets to be matched to the same size too..

The flow of the throttle body is higher than the flow of the inlet valves at full lift/duration..
Image
User avatar
User

chris

Rank

Non Member

Posts

96

Joined

Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:31 am

Location

Melbourne , Australia


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

VALVES

Postby chris » Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:49 am

David do you think its worthwhile changing to the bigger valves in my ATMO with my multi throttle bodies and long duration cams . Do the A610 valves fit with machining, I intend on fitting double valve springs.
Are the standard pistons ok.

Chris W
no avatar
User

Alan Moore

Rank

Non Member

Posts

251

Joined

Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:04 pm

Location

Brisbane Australia


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Postby Alan Moore » Mon Jan 09, 2006 10:58 am

I have fitted the larger valves to my turbo heads and found that the valves were virtually as big as the valve seat inserts. So I fitted larger valve seat inserts to both the inlet and exhaust valves. Also when porting I took quite a bit of the large boss that supports the valve guide in the exhaust port away.

There is not much spare material in the exhaust ports before you hit water, except where the boss is. In the turbo heads at least, the inlet ports are fine and only need cleaning up.

Surprisingly the conrods are identical between the GTA Turbo and the Volvo B280F I stripped.

David,
Do you know the sizes of the turbo housings on the A610?
GTA V6 Turbo
Renault 4CV 16TS Power
BMW 2002 Tii M3 Power
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: VALVES

Postby David Gentleman » Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:14 pm

chris wrote:David do you think its worthwhile changing to the bigger valves in my ATMO with my multi throttle bodies and long duration cams . Do the A610 valves fit with machining, I intend on fitting double valve springs.
Are the standard pistons ok.

Chris W


I don't think you will gain much due to the fact you already have high lift long duration cams. Standard pistons are fine for non turbo application. They have a raised crown whereas the A610 pistons are dead flat.
Image
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:18 pm

Alan Moore wrote:I have fitted the larger valves to my turbo heads and found that the valves were virtually as big as the valve seat inserts. So I fitted larger valve seat inserts to both the inlet and exhaust valves. Also when porting I took quite a bit of the large boss that supports the valve guide in the exhaust port away.

There is not much spare material in the exhaust ports before you hit water, except where the boss is. In the turbo heads at least, the inlet ports are fine and only need cleaning up.

Surprisingly the conrods are identical between the GTA Turbo and the Volvo B280F I stripped.

David,
Do you know the sizes of the turbo housings on the A610?


Alan, the Z7X heads have that boss around the valve guide removed as standard. Basically, the 2.5 Turbo and atmo heads have a minimum internal port size of 40.5mm, where as the later heads have 46mm, due to that metal being removed..

All the conrods on all the PRV's are the same.

The specs on the A610 turbo charger is a 60 trim compressor wheel (60mm exducer and 46mm inducer) in a 0.42 T3 compressor housing, and a 0.63 AR exhaust housing with a 60mm T3 turbine wheel)
Image


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 239 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France