New Engine

Renault & Alpine General Discussion
User avatar
User

Tony Smith

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1407

Joined

Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:50 pm

Location

Kent


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Cost point of view

Postby Tony Smith » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:43 pm

if you want to keep the cost to a minimum then sticking with the original engine is the best bet. All the other PRV's don't drop straight in as they are in transverse cars and you will need to rob several parts off your original engine - and all of them are naturally aspirated not turbo. Also a non-original engine will de-value the car and most classic car insurance companies will not insure you either - I had to argue my case big time when I put my Safrane biturbo lump in - even though it looks very similar to the untrained eye. If Davids engine doesn't come through I will have a few quite soon providing current plans come to fruition.
Alpines - GTA 3.0 Turbo, GTA 3.0 Inj (Project DD), GTA 6.2 V8 (500 bhp) , R32 Skyline GTR, BMW Alpina B10 635 Highline, Alpina B10 E39 5 Series, Jaguar 4.2 XKR, Laguna 205GT, BMW 120d.
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Cost point of view

Postby David Gentleman » Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:08 pm

The benefit of starting with the Laguna base though, is the option to turbo (or twin turbo :wink: ), as with the engine I am building..

When you work out the cost of a full rebuild of an original Z7U, (rings, shells, gaskets, seals, o rings, chains etc) it works easily into hundreds just for parts..
Image
Previous


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AdsBot [Google] and 269 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France