N2o

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

User avatar
User

gt5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

594

Joined

Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm

Location

york


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby gt5 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:19 pm

:wink: OK just for Peter as long as he doesnt come a arrest me :wink:

The only one answer to the MANY Many replies, Its the only question and answer im posting, so dont ask for anymore replies :lol:

Forum; Shame the GTA doesn't respond to a piggyback units like the japanese cars do...

Things like Dastek, Unichip etc, can't remedy the over correcting ignition retard and fuel enrichment caused by the high inlet temp air sensor..



Dastek;Yes it can, it has two temperature inputs that can be linked to any of the maps inside the Unichip, so timing & fuel corrections can made versus both water & charge temp, but rarely are they needed unless there is a specific problem with the cars compensation maps (pretty rare)
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:19 pm

Some Dastek advertising :)

The UNICHIP can be used for the following functions:



Alter ignition timing in a 3D map down to 0.1degree resolution. YES

Alter fuel mixture in a 3D map by +-50%. NO

Control variable valve timing. N/A

Control variable induction systems. N/A

Control turbo wastegate solenoid systems. YES

Record maximum boost pressure. YES

Record maximum RPM. YES

Water injection control. YES

Nitrous oxide control. YES (ON OFF SWITCH)

Automatic secondary map when water or nitrous is active. YES

Automatic switch back to primary map when water or nitrous is low or de-activated YES

Road speed governor delimiting. N/A

Calibration of electronic speedometers. N/A

Conversion of electronic speedometers from KMH to MPH. N/A

Drive additional fuel injectors, with variable blend control. YES

Launch control. N/A

Full throttle gear changes. N/A

Idle speed stabilization. N/A

Conversion to individual throttle bodies on certain cars. YES

Conversion of mechanical injection systems to full 3D fuel & ignition control. NO

Conversion from flap type Air Flow meters to less restrictive Hot Film meters. YES

Multiple maps to suit different fuels. YES

Shift lights YES

Alter or implement rev limits NOT ON A GTA

Alter or implement boost limits YES

..it just can't increase the fuel beyond 5v map..
Image
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:20 pm

stephendell wrote:
What would we want a stand alone ECU for if not to hype the power of our poor old V6's more so when "nearly" every one on here seems anti power


I'm not anti power :wink:

I've got 3 PRV 24v engines, a standalone ECU and a Rotrex supercharger with oil cooler cluttering up my living room!



My mate had the same sort of storage arrangements ,he came back one day to find it had all fallen through the floor :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

gt5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

594

Joined

Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm

Location

york


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby gt5 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:21 pm

stephendell wrote:[quote

I've got 3 PRV 24v engines, a standalone ECU and a Rotrex supercharger with oil cooler cluttering up my living room!


I said nearly everyone Stephen :lol: :wink:
User avatar
User

darrenbiggs

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1499

Joined

Thu Apr 29, 2004 1:03 pm

Location

Horley - Nr Gatwick


Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Postby darrenbiggs » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:23 pm

stephendell wrote:
What would we want a stand alone ECU for if not to hype the power of our poor old V6's more so when "nearly" every one on here seems anti power


I'm not anti power :wink:

I've got 3 PRV 24v engines, a standalone ECU and a Rotrex supercharger with oil cooler cluttering up my living room!


So in theory Steve you're telling us you've got a living room pushing out about 700 hp.

Not bad. 8)
I'm just here for the gasoline.
User avatar
User

stephendell

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

7463

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:25 pm

Location

London


Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Postby stephendell » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:23 pm

That's not mentioning the nice new line in grey velour armchairs!
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:26 pm

gt5 wrote::wink: OK just for Peter as long as he doesnt come a arrest me :wink:

The only one answer to the MANY Many replies, Its the only question and answer im posting, so dont ask for anymore replies :lol:

Forum; Shame the GTA doesn't respond to a piggyback units like the japanese cars do...

Things like Dastek, Unichip etc, can't remedy the over correcting ignition retard and fuel enrichment caused by the high inlet temp air sensor..



Dastek;Yes it can, it has two temperature inputs that can be linked to any of the maps inside the Unichip, so timing & fuel corrections can made versus both water & charge temp, but rarely are they needed unless there is a specific problem with the cars compensation maps (pretty rare)



And how is it going to correct the fuel when we are at maximum range on the map signal? There is no more fuel to give...

And how will two settings be setup when, the car is instantly peaking the air temp reading on the RR.
Image
User avatar
User

gt5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

594

Joined

Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm

Location

york


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby gt5 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:27 pm

David Gentleman wrote:
gt5 wrote::wink: OK just for Peter as long as he doesnt come a arrest me :wink:

The only one answer to the MANY Many replies, Its the only question and answer im posting, so dont ask for anymore replies :lol:

Forum; Shame the GTA doesn't respond to a piggyback units like the japanese cars do...

Things like Dastek, Unichip etc, can't remedy the over correcting ignition retard and fuel enrichment caused by the high inlet temp air sensor..



Dastek;Yes it can, it has two temperature inputs that can be linked to any of the maps inside the Unichip, so timing & fuel corrections can made versus both water & charge temp, but rarely are they needed unless there is a specific problem with the cars compensation maps (pretty rare)



And how is it going to correct the fuel when we are at maximum range on the map signal? There is no more fuel to give...

And how will two settings be setup when, the car is instantly peaking the air temp reading on the RR.


:lol: :lol: No more answers i said :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

stephendell

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

7463

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:25 pm

Location

London


Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Postby stephendell » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:27 pm

So in theory Steve you're telling us you've got a living room pushing out about 700 hp


Fortunately only the ECU, Supercharger and two interiors are in the living room. Nice driving position over by the window though!
User avatar
User

peterg

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2501

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm

Location

Cumbria


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby peterg » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:30 pm

I'm definitely not anti power I can just see the limitations of the turbo PRV on the standard set up. I am going to be going back to the RR next week to re-set my fuelling so I will have some new results which will show a significant improvement.....the chargecooler wasnt actually working on the last session due to airlocks in the system and the car had an intermittent misfire that is now totally cured.
I dont have upgraded internals but my engine is a recon item from about 5 years ago and I have replaced a hell of a lot of other stuff......I paid over the top money for my car because it had a recon engine in it......low mileage and lots of years is not necessarily a good thing and NOS will put a fair bit of strain on your engine that was my only concern.
My aim is to get around the 300 bhp mark which with the lightweight of the car will do nicely for my needs....if I thought a Dastek could get me much beyond the set up I have now I would buy one, but as I am hopefully at around the 250bhp mark at the minute I dont think its worth the effort....the fully prog ECU will increase both power and driveability and allow me to run my bigger injectors.
I dont suppose Dastek would have any legal issues with you printing answers.....you own the rights to the email and if printed are doing it to promote their products to us unbelievers.
User avatar
User

gt5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

594

Joined

Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm

Location

york


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby gt5 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:42 pm

As i mentiond Peter, i am sure they will answer any questions, I am sure the standalone will be better then the Dastek at the higher end of the tuning scale, and if the cost is only £100-£150 ish more then i paid for the dastek inc the other things on the day it sounds a bargain, and maybe i should have waited :shock: i was under the impression that it was going to cost over a thousand with the bits and pieces req + mapping ect, :?:
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:49 pm

gt5 wrote:As i mentiond Peter, i am sure they will answer any questions, I am sure the standalone will be better then the Dastek at the higher end of the tuning scale, and if the cost is only £100-£150 ish more then i paid for the dastek inc the other things on the day it sounds a bargain, and maybe i should have waited :shock: i was under the impression that it was going to cost over a thousand with the bits and pieces req + mapping ect, :?:


Well yes, the only things that cost extra are the bigger injectors, 3 bar map sensor etc, wideband lambda, but these are the things you need to do it properly in order to get more power.

End of the day whether you are running standard ecu, Dastek or a full blown standalone ecu, on standard map sensor and injectors, you can only run 1 bar max and around 230-240bhp.
Image
User avatar
User

gt5

Rank

Non Member

Posts

594

Joined

Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm

Location

york


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby gt5 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:53 pm

OK, One more reply , just to chew over :)

Also, you have to remember, there is no useful mapping after 14.7psi, as the GTA mapsensor is a 2 bar absolute sensor. If the RR map your car for 20psi, it will fuel exactly the same at 14psi, so if you run a boost pressure lower than 20, it will overfuel massively...



This is why the Unichip reads from its own 2.5bar absolute (22psi boost) pressure sensor, so that the Unichip can read beyond the original design of the std car. We could use a 3.5bar (36psi) absolute version if required.
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:57 pm

gt5 wrote:OK, One more reply , just to chew over :)

Also, you have to remember, there is no useful mapping after 14.7psi, as the GTA mapsensor is a 2 bar absolute sensor. If the RR map your car for 20psi, it will fuel exactly the same at 14psi, so if you run a boost pressure lower than 20, it will overfuel massively...



This is why the Unichip reads from its own 2.5bar absolute (22psi boost) pressure sensor, so that the Unichip can read beyond the original design of the std car. We could use a 3.5bar (36psi) absolute version if required.


Steve, it doesnt matter if the unichip has its own sensor and can read 100psi -

HOW CAN IT PUT EXTRA FUEL IN TO COMPENSATE FOR THE EXTRA BOOST WHEN IT DOESNT CONTROL THE FUELING!? :lol:
Image
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:01 pm

Best thing to do Steve, is ignore the schpiel on the website, as most of it applies to other cars and not the GTA.

Download their installer and setup and manual and the wiring diagram, and then you'll get the gist of what is actually possible. :)
Image
PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 192 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France