Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy
Non Member
594
Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm
york
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
Non Member
10431
Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am
Derbyshire
stephendell wrote:What would we want a stand alone ECU for if not to hype the power of our poor old V6's more so when "nearly" every one on here seems anti power
I'm not anti power
I've got 3 PRV 24v engines, a standalone ECU and a Rotrex supercharger with oil cooler cluttering up my living room!
Non Member
1499
Thu Apr 29, 2004 1:03 pm
Horley - Nr Gatwick
stephendell wrote:What would we want a stand alone ECU for if not to hype the power of our poor old V6's more so when "nearly" every one on here seems anti power
I'm not anti power
I've got 3 PRV 24v engines, a standalone ECU and a Rotrex supercharger with oil cooler cluttering up my living room!
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
gt5 wrote::wink: OK just for Peter as long as he doesnt come a arrest me
The only one answer to the MANY Many replies, Its the only question and answer im posting, so dont ask for anymore replies
Forum; Shame the GTA doesn't respond to a piggyback units like the japanese cars do...
Things like Dastek, Unichip etc, can't remedy the over correcting ignition retard and fuel enrichment caused by the high inlet temp air sensor..
Dastek;Yes it can, it has two temperature inputs that can be linked to any of the maps inside the Unichip, so timing & fuel corrections can made versus both water & charge temp, but rarely are they needed unless there is a specific problem with the cars compensation maps (pretty rare)
Non Member
594
Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm
york
David Gentleman wrote:gt5 wrote::wink: OK just for Peter as long as he doesnt come a arrest me
The only one answer to the MANY Many replies, Its the only question and answer im posting, so dont ask for anymore replies
Forum; Shame the GTA doesn't respond to a piggyback units like the japanese cars do...
Things like Dastek, Unichip etc, can't remedy the over correcting ignition retard and fuel enrichment caused by the high inlet temp air sensor..
Dastek;Yes it can, it has two temperature inputs that can be linked to any of the maps inside the Unichip, so timing & fuel corrections can made versus both water & charge temp, but rarely are they needed unless there is a specific problem with the cars compensation maps (pretty rare)
And how is it going to correct the fuel when we are at maximum range on the map signal? There is no more fuel to give...
And how will two settings be setup when, the car is instantly peaking the air temp reading on the RR.
Non Member
2501
Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm
Cumbria
Non Member
594
Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm
york
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
gt5 wrote:As i mentiond Peter, i am sure they will answer any questions, I am sure the standalone will be better then the Dastek at the higher end of the tuning scale, and if the cost is only £100-£150 ish more then i paid for the dastek inc the other things on the day it sounds a bargain, and maybe i should have waited i was under the impression that it was going to cost over a thousand with the bits and pieces req + mapping ect,
Non Member
594
Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:35 pm
york
Non Member
3474
Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am
Colchester, Essex
gt5 wrote:OK, One more reply , just to chew over
Also, you have to remember, there is no useful mapping after 14.7psi, as the GTA mapsensor is a 2 bar absolute sensor. If the RR map your car for 20psi, it will fuel exactly the same at 14psi, so if you run a boost pressure lower than 20, it will overfuel massively...
This is why the Unichip reads from its own 2.5bar absolute (22psi boost) pressure sensor, so that the Unichip can read beyond the original design of the std car. We could use a 3.5bar (36psi) absolute version if required.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 204 guests