R5 Alpine/Gordini restoration

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

User avatar
User

boostrider

Rank

Non Member

Posts

75

Joined

Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:35 pm

Location

sutton surrey


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby boostrider » Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:19 pm

David Gentleman wrote:
boostrider wrote: I don't hate gtas's or think they're rubbish , i know they're normally slow though !!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:


A Gordini 5 Turbo does 0-60 in 9.8 seconds, so wheres that logic...?
Mines weighs 700 kilos and has got 200 bhp though hasn't it ? It hits 100 mph in a quarter of a mile from a standstill on only 15 psi of boost . When peterg's gta can do that , he can then start bragging :wink:
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:22 pm

boostrider wrote:
David Gentleman wrote:
boostrider wrote: I don't hate gtas's or think they're rubbish , i know they're normally slow though !!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:


A Gordini 5 Turbo does 0-60 in 9.8 seconds, so wheres that logic...?
Mines weighs 700 kilos and has got 200 bhp though hasn't it ? It hits 100 mph in a quarter of a mile from a standstill on only 15 psi of boost . When peterg's gta can do that , he can then start bragging :wink:


Yes, but you said 'GTAs are normally slow', so you mean standard ones (which do 0-60 in 5.8 ) but the Gordini does 0-60 in 9.8 so this it what you could call pityfully slow, even the 5GT is nearly 3 seconds quicker as standard..

Your car has nearly a 90% increase in power from standard. :lol:
Image
User avatar
User

peterg

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2501

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm

Location

Cumbria


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby peterg » Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:31 pm

Well its all to play for....if you use the calculator David put on the thread my car is quicker than a 200bhp 700kg Gordini before I added cams and a bigger turbo...and on hillclimbs Ive beaten the best 'up to 2 litre' cars in the country on straighter tracks....but I've never seen a Gordini at an event.
Gary is way too cocky!
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:59 pm

peterg wrote:Well its all to play for....if you use the calculator David put on the thread my car is quicker than a 200bhp 700kg Gordini before I added cams and a bigger turbo...and on hillclimbs Ive beaten the best 'up to 2 litre' cars in the country on straighter tracks....but Ive never seen a Gordini at an event.
Gary is way too cocky!


OOOOOOH it's getting serious....... this might be worth a watch...... :twisted:

where's the duel gonna be then :?:

Gentlemen choose your weapons :!:
User avatar
User

Tony Smith

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1407

Joined

Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:50 pm

Location

Kent


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Can I just say...

Postby Tony Smith » Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:18 pm

I have not said at any stage that Gary's 'dini is faster than Peters GTA, I can't say that because I haven't been in it but I have just tried to confirm that Gary's car does take some beating in a straight line and confirm that I have witnessed that performace first hand, both on the road and on the dyno. Possibly it does feel faster in it because it is small and noisy compared to a GTA but I've seen it take some big scalps at the pod despite having no traction off the line whatsover, the dini's low gearing helps alot - 5th is lower than 4th on a GTA. Considering I'm probably the ownly person in the uk to have driven a GTA as quick as Pete's and I have driven Gary's dini albeit a couple of years ago and I wouldn't like to bet alot of money either way. Yes the GTA should launch better and will obviously be faster top end but 20-100 I think will be too close to call.
Alpines - GTA 3.0 Turbo, GTA 3.0 Inj (Project DD), GTA 6.2 V8 (500 bhp) , R32 Skyline GTR, BMW Alpina B10 635 Highline, Alpina B10 E39 5 Series, Jaguar 4.2 XKR, Laguna 205GT, BMW 120d.
User avatar
User

Tony Smith

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1407

Joined

Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:50 pm

Location

Kent


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Postby Tony Smith » Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:19 pm

Gentlemen choose your weapons :!:


Why does Dave get to choose their weapons? :lol: :lol:
Alpines - GTA 3.0 Turbo, GTA 3.0 Inj (Project DD), GTA 6.2 V8 (500 bhp) , R32 Skyline GTR, BMW Alpina B10 635 Highline, Alpina B10 E39 5 Series, Jaguar 4.2 XKR, Laguna 205GT, BMW 120d.
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:25 pm

Gentlemen choose your weapons :!:


Why does Dave get to choose their weapons? :lol: :lol:



learn to spell you chimp....... :oops:

joke backfired :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

boostrider

Rank

Non Member

Posts

75

Joined

Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:35 pm

Location

sutton surrey


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby boostrider » Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:52 pm

David Gentleman wrote:.

Your car has nearly a 90% increase in power from standard. :lol:
Yep , not bad for a standard engine with only gt turbo pistons swopped into it 8) The new engine will be quicker than the knacked old one too , the car will be even lighter as well so it will go like fooooook . I'm putting a gt28 turbo on it after it's run in so expect the power level to go up even more :shock:
User avatar
User

peterg

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2501

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:26 pm

Location

Cumbria


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby peterg » Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:35 am

You mean it will wheelspin all over the place and fail to get its miserable 4 cylinder torque free power down on the track!!! :lol: :lol: :wink:
I assume you'lll be running road tyres to keep the playing field level?
User avatar
User

stephendell

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

7463

Joined

Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:25 pm

Location

London


Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Postby stephendell » Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:40 am

There's no point having a 160 mph top speed if it takes 10 miles and half an hour to reach it is there


You need just over a mile from a standing start and a bit of room to slow down before you get to the end of the runway :wink:

Bruntingthorpe main straight is ideal...

I feel a club proving day coming on 8)
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:46 am

stephendell wrote:
There's no point having a 160 mph top speed if it takes 10 miles and half an hour to reach it is there


You need just over a mile from a standing start and a bit of room to slow down before you get to the end of the runway :wink:

Bruntingthorpe main straight is ideal...

)


167mph if I remember correctly... :wink:
Image
User avatar
User

boostrider

Rank

Non Member

Posts

75

Joined

Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:35 pm

Location

sutton surrey


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby boostrider » Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:35 am

peterg wrote:You mean it will wheelspin all over the place and fail to get its miserable 4 cylinder torque free power down on the track!!! :lol: :lol: :wink:
I assume you'lll be running road tyres to keep the playing field level?
I'll come pisssing past that slow plastic heap of a motor you call fast mate , despite the fact the engine is almost standard :lol: :lol: :lol:
Last edited by boostrider on Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
User

boostrider

Rank

Non Member

Posts

75

Joined

Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:35 pm

Location

sutton surrey


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby boostrider » Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:37 am

David Gentleman wrote:
stephendell wrote:
There's no point having a 160 mph top speed if it takes 10 miles and half an hour to reach it is there


You need just over a mile from a standing start and a bit of room to slow down before you get to the end of the runway :wink:

Bruntingthorpe main straight is ideal...

)


167mph if I remember correctly... :wink:
dream on mate , a gta hit 160 mph from a standing start in a mile , no fooooookin chance :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:52 am

come on Peter set a date for battle then.......
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:02 pm

boostrider wrote:
David Gentleman wrote:
stephendell wrote:
There's no point having a 160 mph top speed if it takes 10 miles and half an hour to reach it is there


You need just over a mile from a standing start and a bit of room to slow down before you get to the end of the runway :wink:

Bruntingthorpe main straight is ideal...

)


167mph if I remember correctly... :wink:
dream on mate , a gta hit 160 mph from a standing start in a mile , no fooooookin chance :lol: :lol: :lol:


I was just talking about Joe's 610 topping out at 167 on the limiter at Brunters.... 8) Its in the magazine..
Image
PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 204 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France