Jacking point crossmember

Renault & Alpine General Discussion
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

hammerite
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:40 pm

Aiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii amarite bodger and a diff MOT station .
User avatar
User

mitchella

Rank

Non Member

Posts

302

Joined

Sat Apr 24, 2004 12:23 am

Location

Penicuik, Scotland


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby mitchella » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:55 am

Just a quick thought/question - with this new fangly compooter system that they have put in for MOTs - can the next MOT station see the reasons for failure that other places have keyed in? In which case, your bodging will need to be quite good if the tester can see something like "Rust peforation in a major structural area" or something damming like that when he calls up the MOT history of your car. :shock:
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:02 am

Yes ,I've been wondering about that .The emissions have to be retested after an hour or so to prove some work has been done to correct the failure, I think . :?
On the fail sheet it says ' Rear vehicle structure has excessive corrosion ,seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mounting points '

Not too specific so that could be anywhere I chose to point out to them as the main rear subframe has had some pukka repairs done 8)
Image


Where's that professional MOT fella got to :?:
User avatar
User

David Gentleman

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3474

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 8:10 am

Location

Colchester, Essex


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby David Gentleman » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:17 am

mitchella wrote:Just a quick thought/question - with this new fangly compooter system that they have put in for MOTs - can the next MOT station see the reasons for failure that other places have keyed in? In which case, your bodging will need to be quite good if the tester can see something like "Rust peforation in a major structural area" or something damming like that when he calls up the MOT history of your car. :shock:


Luckily no... on the new MOT systems, each section is a ticked box on the computer....either a pass or a fail on a specific area, no full details. These are still written by hand on the failure sheet by the tester.
Image
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:38 am

clee wrote:Yes ,I've been wondering about that .The emissions have to be retested after an hour or so to prove some work has been done to correct the failure, I think . :?
On the fail sheet it says ' Rear vehicle structure has excessive corrosion ,seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mounting points '

Not too specific so that could be anywhere I chose to point out to them as the main rear subframe has had some pukka repairs done 8)
Image


Where's that professional MOT fella got to :?:


chemical metal and hammerite

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:53 am

COUGH :!: Euro-blinger :wink:
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:00 am

ya know dat!
no avatar
User

Alpineandy

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

2381

Joined

Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:37 am

Location

North Essex


Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Postby Alpineandy » Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:01 pm

Chicken wire & isopon....
Alpine A110, Renault Safrane 2.5dt, Hudson Kindred Spirit (Renault powered), transAlp (Honda) and Ducati Multistrada
User avatar
User

darrenbiggs

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1499

Joined

Thu Apr 29, 2004 1:03 pm

Location

Horley - Nr Gatwick


Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Postby darrenbiggs » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:22 pm

Pikeys :lol:
I'm just here for the gasoline.
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:39 pm

darrenbiggs wrote:Pikeys :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:34 pm

darrenbiggs wrote:Pikeys :lol:



And Proud :P :P
I'd rather feck-it-up myself than pay someone to f-i-u for me :lol: :lol:
User avatar
User

simonsays74

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1296

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:12 pm

Location

Belfast (££££ Zone!!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby simonsays74 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:42 pm

clee wrote:Yes ,I've been wondering about that .The emissions have to be retested after an hour or so to prove some work has been done to correct the failure, I think . :?
On the fail sheet it says ' Rear vehicle structure has excessive corrosion ,seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mounting points '

Not too specific so that could be anywhere I chose to point out to them as the main rear subframe has had some pukka repairs done 8)
Image


Where's that professional MOT fella got to :?:


you talkin about me fella?? :)
User avatar
User

clee

Rank

Non Member

Posts

10431

Joined

Fri May 28, 2004 11:58 am

Location

Derbyshire


Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Postby clee » Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:45 pm

simonsays74 wrote:
clee wrote:Yes ,I've been wondering about that .The emissions have to be retested after an hour or so to prove some work has been done to correct the failure, I think . :?
On the fail sheet it says ' Rear vehicle structure has excessive corrosion ,seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mounting points '

Not too specific so that could be anywhere I chose to point out to them as the main rear subframe has had some pukka repairs done 8)
Image


Where's that professional MOT fella got to :?:


you talkin about me fella?? :)


Rite-so! that's the very man .

well ??????????????????????
User avatar
User

simonsays74

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1296

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:12 pm

Location

Belfast (££££ Zone!!)


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Postby simonsays74 » Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:57 pm

in my humble opinion............

if you have going to all the trouble of doing what looks like a great job on your engine rebuild, then i have no idea why you want to bodge a body/chassis repair?! :?

cut it out and do it right!

nuff said.
PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 219 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France