The good old days ?

Renault & Alpine General Discussion

Moderators: eastlmark, BIG_MVS, phildini, Test Moderator, Alpineandy

no avatar
User

MFaulks

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1552

Joined

Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:25 pm


Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Postby MFaulks » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:13 pm

Doesn't the sky look pretty tonight - 8) go look :)
... A diamond is only a piece of coal that did well under pressure... PRV afflicted, may be I need to squeeze harder!!!!

https://www.facebook.com/maftecfaulks
User avatar
User

simontaylor

Rank

Non Member

Posts

5602

Joined

Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:33 pm

Location

Fleet, Hampshire


Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Postby simontaylor » Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:24 pm

so long as there are no cloud tomorrow, I'll be a happy man :D :D :D
1986 : '86 GTA v6 BW-EFR turbo, with Adaptronic ECU
Firsts at
2007 : Gurston Down & RAOC Champion
2008 : Rushmoor & Eelmoor & ACSMC Hillclimb class Champion
2009 : Longcross & Eelmoor
2010 : Crystal Palace & Eelmoor
2016 : Rushmoor & 5th O/A
User avatar
User

jon_viola

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1159

Joined

Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:45 pm

Location

Sussex


Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Postby jon_viola » Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:31 pm

So- are there any better manifolds available? And does anyone have proof that they help the 2.5 GTA engine :D :D :D
1989 GTA Turbo
2003 Mercedes E320 CDI Estate- A.K.A Badke Bus

www.badkequartet.co.uk
User avatar
User

si21

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2094

Joined

Mon May 09, 2005 8:24 pm

Location

S.E London


Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Postby si21 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:08 pm

jon_viola wrote:So- are there any better manifolds available? And does anyone have proof that they help the 2.5 GTA engine :D :D :D


They help the Atmo and if they help the Atmo get rid of exhaust gases then sure as eggs is eggs they will help a car under boost as well; the primaries look bigger than the overall bore of the standard turbo manifold :shock:

I was Wondering, as I can't rememeb what they look like I now, would the standard atmo zorst manifolds be any better, they are cast they could be modified, opened, flowed; do they fit a a turbo head? I am sure Mr faulks will know hes probably been there seen it done it :lol: :lol: :lol: it was at all worthwhile :?:

John the Manifolds are not cheap though and you need further piping to complete the turbo installtion and box/pipe to exit everything, as a one off it all adds up :shock:

si21
User avatar
User

mettersl

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

2027

Joined

Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:46 pm

Location

Saffron Walden- North Essex


Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Postby mettersl » Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:25 pm

I'm no expert but I think it's harder on a turbo, longer, bigger diameter exhaust manifolds pre turbo increase lag, so there is a trade off between lag and power that an atmo doesn't have. I think exhaust pulse management might be a factor if the branches aren't even
Same with the pressure and intercooler side too I would expect, and positioning of the waste gate and dump valve ( plus sizing) are all factors.
Would be fun to have a go, but I expect supercharging is probably much easier to engineer.

Anyone who knows care to comment? That porker manifold looked like there had been quite a bit of thought gone into it.

Lee
User avatar
User

si21

Rank

Non Member

Posts

2094

Joined

Mon May 09, 2005 8:24 pm

Location

S.E London


Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 2 times

I am no egg spurt either

Postby si21 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:06 am

mettersl wrote:I'm no expert but I think it's harder on a turbo, longer, bigger diameter exhaust manifolds pre turbo increase lag, so there is a trade off between lag and power that an atmo doesn't have. I think exhaust pulse management might be a factor if the branches aren't even
Same with the pressure and intercooler side too I would expect, and positioning of the waste gate and dump valve ( plus sizing) are all factors.
Would be fun to have a go, but I expect supercharging is probably much easier to engineer.

Anyone who knows care to comment? That porker manifold looked like there had been quite a bit of thought gone into it.

Lee


I can see what your saying about pipe size causing lag, however, I see it this way by using bigger manifolds you improve the performance/response of the engine; if the engine picks up without the need of boost youve not lost performance at the bottom of the rev range and you get to the point that the turbo will pick up sooner eliminating the effect of lag. You then have the benefit of free flowing gases further up the range so better response through the whole range; from the bottom through to an increased capacity at the top end with a bigger turbo or more boost. Remember the exhaust manifold improves the efficiency in removing exhaust gases so the engine will now be moving more gas more quickly, is any performance actually lost? You have however increased efficiency so depending on tutbo choice the turbo should come on boost earlier and harder for longer :twisted:

I guess like all things it all depends on mods being matched cafefully.

I am not sure the exhaust manifold is as critical on a turbo in comparison to a normally aspirated car, to get reasonable power hence the GTAs crap manifold. The 21 turbo has a 4 into 1 manifold, the two outside branches on the 4 pot being longer than the two centre branches. That said 300 plus bhp is being extracted from this manifold. The 2.5 v6 has 2 extra pots so should produce more pulses and exhaust gas; I therefore cant understand why smaller spec T3 used on the GTA is more laggy than the lager speck T3 fitted to 21 tutbo. It can only be one of two things, the greater distance to the turbo in the pipe work and the really crap manifold or the combination of both.

I dare say equal lenth primeries on the exhaust manifold will help flow but probably if your going for an ultimate spec engine but is not vital. Interestingly the atmo manifold does not really have a secondary pipe just a large collector where it immeadiately joins the exhaust system. I have always been of the belief that the longer the primary the more torque is produced. This is because of higher gas speed obtained...I rest my case.

Q the Eggspurts :lol: Firing squad at the ready :lol:

si21
User avatar
User

mettersl

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

2027

Joined

Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:46 pm

Location

Saffron Walden- North Essex


Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Postby mettersl » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:54 am

Si,
I agree on everything you say, the only concern I have is on turbos more power usually means more lag, even if max power and torque are increased. This is a double edged sword.
The state of the art now is multiple turbos, often different sizes so you compensate for the lag by having either lower inertia turbo's to spin up faster, or a lower inertia turbo to spin up first, but these all need more controls so are probably impractical for the enthusiast tuner.
For quarter mile times the design is straightforward, big pipes, smooth curves, big turbo, low back pressure after the turbo, probably quite a bit of lag too.
For road use, short or no lag as a goal brings in more complexity.
I am not arguing the current system is good, it isn't, but the replacement needs thought...as you know.
No one bitten yet?
Lee
User avatar
User

Tony Smith

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1407

Joined

Fri Apr 16, 2004 4:50 pm

Location

Kent


Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Not true

Postby Tony Smith » Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:13 pm

mettersl wrote:Si,
I agree on everything you say, the only concern I have is on turbos more power usually means more lag, even if max power and torque are increased.


Only if you increase the size of the rotating parts in your turbo, or change something that affects the air flow. More boost equals less lag, so if you wind the boost up on most turbo cars it will reduce lag, it may have a more pronounced step as it comes on boost so the lag seems more pronounced but the time to get on boost will still be less.
Alpines - GTA 3.0 Turbo, GTA 3.0 Inj (Project DD), GTA 6.2 V8 (500 bhp) , R32 Skyline GTR, BMW Alpina B10 635 Highline, Alpina B10 E39 5 Series, Jaguar 4.2 XKR, Laguna 205GT, BMW 120d.
User avatar
User

jon_viola

Rank

Non Member

Posts

1159

Joined

Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:45 pm

Location

Sussex


Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Postby jon_viola » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:29 pm

Out of interest whats the diameter of the manifolds on an A610 as opposed to a GTA?
1989 GTA Turbo
2003 Mercedes E320 CDI Estate- A.K.A Badke Bus

www.badkequartet.co.uk
User avatar
User

mettersl

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

2027

Joined

Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:46 pm

Location

Saffron Walden- North Essex


Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Postby mettersl » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:15 pm

I suspect they are the same, bigger downpipe post turbo...


Anyone able to confirm- Clee, David?

Lee
User avatar
User

andyh877

Rank

Non Member

Posts

3709

Joined

Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am

Location

Alpine France


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Postby andyh877 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:36 am

mettersl wrote:I suspect they are the same, bigger downpipe post turbo...


Anyone able to confirm- Clee, David?

Lee


i can hear DG franticly clicking trying to find some more theory on the net :lol:
no avatar
User

TONY LAW

Rank

Non Member

Posts

137

Joined

Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:45 pm

Location

Essex


Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Postby TONY LAW » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:04 pm

Image

Getting there but the proof is in the pudding..
no avatar
User

andy001

Rank

Non Member

Posts

972

Joined

Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:09 pm


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Postby andy001 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:25 pm

WOW....where did you get that wall paper from 8) 8) 8)
User avatar
User

mettersl

Rank

Club Member

Club Member
Posts

2027

Joined

Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:46 pm

Location

Saffron Walden- North Essex


Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 59 times

Postby mettersl » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:47 pm

Looking good, when will it be running?
Cheers
Lee
User avatar
User

PaulyA610

Rank

Non Member

Posts

902

Joined

Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:30 pm

Location

Gloucester


Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Postby PaulyA610 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:38 pm

WOW Tony that looks a great build, very nicely done fella. Ditto on the wallpaper where did you get it from??? :lol:
Lotus Evora 400
Renault R8
Renault Megane R.S 265 Trophy
Renault megane sport tourer



GAZ Suspension Dealer,SPAX Dealer, Forge Motorsport Dealer,Alpine ICE Dealer,
PreviousNext


  • Advertisement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 178 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | Renault' and 'Alpine' are trademarks of Renault S.A.S. or its subsidiaries and are used with kind permission of Renault France