Moderators: eastlmark, Test Moderator
Club Member
5097
Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:12 am
Sandbach
Non Member
3709
Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am
Alpine France
Non Member
902
Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:30 pm
Gloucester
Non Member
3709
Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:11 am
Alpine France
PaulyA610 wrote:Yea you could get a F355 however the Venturi has the running costs of a Clio 172!!!! They are cheap as chips to run!! Richards is properly mint and is one of two Bi turbos also should be faster than a frazza!
Non Member
2094
Mon May 09, 2005 8:24 pm
S.E London
PaulyA610 wrote:Yea you could get a F355 however the Venturi has the running costs of a Clio 172!!!! They are cheap as chips to run!! Richards is properly mint and is one of two Bi turbos also should be faster than a frazza!
Non Member
490
Wed May 30, 2012 12:14 pm
United Kingdom
Non Member
2094
Mon May 09, 2005 8:24 pm
S.E London
blueg33 wrote:Sorry to disappoint but the F355 is quicker (on paper at least) also being an na engine will have less lag etc. I can personally vouch for the F355, and they getter as you go faster. at 173mph on the autoroute it was planted and the temps were going down
Venturi is more rare
Club Member
2027
Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:46 pm
Saffron Walden- North Essex
Non Member
2094
Mon May 09, 2005 8:24 pm
S.E London
mettersl wrote:Si, you aren't Venturi nerdy enough yet, bi turbo isn't PRV, it's the laguna/Clio v6 engine (L7x).
That means cam belt changes and inaccessible coil packs.....
Still I always love a challenge..but not at that price, sorry Richard it's unique, beautiful and in fab condition but is it worth 15k more than a "normal" ( and sill very rare) single turbo PRV atlantique?
Hi Lee your right I know little about the venturis, I wrongly assumed it was a twin turbo' PRV due to the relatively low power output
TBH The extra weight of the cams valves etc alone and a normally aspirated puts out just 250bhp compare it to M3's power output in excess of 300 bhp without turbos.let alone twin turbos surely that spec engine has alot more potential to go
I thought they were getting 260 - 300bhp.from the PRV perhaps thats why I wrongly assumed the lump was a PRV.
Oh well thanks Lee live n learn
Si .........timing belts ...nah loving my PRV chains
Non Member
490
Wed May 30, 2012 12:14 pm
United Kingdom
si21 wrote:blueg33 wrote:Sorry to disappoint but the F355 is quicker (on paper at least) also being an na engine will have less lag etc. I can personally vouch for the F355, and they getter as you go faster. at 173mph on the autoroute it was planted and the temps were going down
Venturi is more rare
And when it goes Ferrari reliability BANG @175MPH it's how much to rebuild the engine in comparison to £6,000 for a PRV but, then it is a Ferrari isn't it
Its nice to own something that nobody else does ....its nice when a Ferrari pulls up alongside you and everybody else is looking at the Ferrari, but the owner of the Ferrari is looking at you
Si21
Non Member
1296
Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:12 pm
Belfast (££££ Zone!!)
Non Member
490
Wed May 30, 2012 12:14 pm
United Kingdom
simonsays74 wrote:Thanks for the interest in the Venturi.
Turbos are variable vane type. Zero lag.
Regarding access for servicing etc. Every 3 years or so I would remove engine etc for timing belt, water pump, spark plugs and the single coil pack thus ensuring reliable running.
It was a £63,000 car when new and requires similar labour times to Ferrari but the parts are so much cheaper. Genuine Citroen parts used.
Please base assumptions on having driven one of the two right hand drive Atlantique 300 Biturbos.
Flights are very cheap to Belfast and you can drive it until you're hearts content.
Richard.
Club Member
5097
Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:12 am
Sandbach
Martin Guard wrote:The best advert for buying the Atlantique 300 is being able to get your golf clubs in the boot. How many supercars can boast that?? Certainly not the 355.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 203 guests